[Fri May  3 04:41:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.7, 158.9) = 6 17 11.38 22 31 45.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 310.3 +/- 43.2
  Background counts = 921.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Fri May  3 04:41:57 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.12'
[Fri May  3 04:45:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 04:45:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.49"
[Fri May  3 04:45:42 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.861
[Fri May  3 04:45:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 0, mean size = 11.49"
[Fri May  3 04:45:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:45:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.csv
[Fri May  3 04:45:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:45:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.csv
[Fri May  3 04:45:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 04:45:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:45:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Fri May  3 04:45:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:45:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Fri May  3 04:45:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 04:46:35 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 10150.700000, observed total counts = 8728.000000
[Fri May  3 04:46:35 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 75
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Warning, spatial fit 66 centroid is now closest to src. 134
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 04:46:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 04:48:25 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 04:48:25 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.49"
[Fri May  3 04:48:25 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.861
[Fri May  3 04:48:25 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 11.49"
[Fri May  3 04:48:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:48:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Fri May  3 04:48:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:48:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Fri May  3 04:48:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 04:48:30 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:48:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Fri May  3 04:48:30 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:48:30 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.csv
[Fri May  3 04:48:30 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Warning, spatial fit 63 centroid is now closest to src. 182
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 04:49:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 04:51:14 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25500.703552, 13774.089630, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May  3 04:51:14 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_src.reg
[Fri May  3 04:51:14 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (256, 121) - (331, 196)
[Fri May  3 04:51:14 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25500.703552, 13774.089630, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24776.469971, 13874.420532, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23484.997345, 14273.957306, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24813.619141, 14379.616852, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23746.000000, 14575.275253, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26139.755829, 13617.991165, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28482.962555, 16391.852936, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25764.966583, 16652.623276, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26984.801208, 14638.093246, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24055.905640, 14970.721954, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23009.104584, 14738.303345, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24259.572937, 13288.252457, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May  3 04:51:14 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0600110101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75.gif