[Sat Aug 25 17:31:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (196.0, 248.4) = 16 22 58.89 -17 54 43.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 119.0 +/- 16.6
  Background counts = 78.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Aug 25 17:31:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.27'
[Sat Aug 25 18:28:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 25 18:28:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Sat Aug 25 18:28:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.787
[Sat Aug 25 18:28:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 10.56"
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 18:44:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 11.326298 pixels away
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 25 20:44:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 25 20:52:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 25 20:52:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Sat Aug 25 20:52:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.787
[Sat Aug 25 20:52:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.56"
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 25 21:28:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0561580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 693.318000, observed total counts = 592.000000
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 25 23:39:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9