[Wed Apr 11 06:25:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (297.9, 331.6) = 9 55 46.61 69 41 25.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1406.9 +/- 56.2
  Background counts = 180.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.002

[Wed Apr 11 06:25:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.40'
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.689
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.63"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 11463.800000, observed total counts = 11055.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 3.588132 pixels
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] 7301.620000 total counts/ 3789.510000 bgd. counts: snr = 57.052750
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 3.588132 pixels
  Position = (298.7, 335.1) = 9 55 45.98 69 41 44.0
  Extent = 15.3 (15.3-30.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 3512.1 +/- 85.4
  Background counts = 3789.5
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.003
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Source 4 is offset by 2.407487 and 2.402828 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.955517 x 4.655494, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1565.710000, observed total counts = 1562.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.957818 pixels
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 3 to 14
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] 1480.379000 total counts/ 1371.590000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.937466
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 4 = 0.957818 pixels
  Position = (299.5, 335.6) = 9 55 45.30 69 41 46.2
  Extent = 7.4 (5.1-9.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 108.8 +/- 38.5
  Background counts = 1371.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9