[Wed Apr 11 06:25:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (343.0, 253.5) = 9 55 9.13 69 35 50.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 149.0 +/- 19.1
  Background counts = 127.3
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006

[Wed Apr 11 06:25:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.58'
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.72"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.877
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 8.72"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 375.505000, observed total counts = 291.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 28
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.72"
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.877
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 8.72"
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Source 28 is offset by -6.449102 and 7.559774 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.002345 x 1.002345, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9