[Wed Apr 11 06:25:27 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (130.2, 381.9) = 9 58 7.16 69 45 6.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.4 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 71.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Wed Apr 11 06:25:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.62'
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.24"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:57 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.976
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 40 for pass 0, mean size = 13.24"
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:25:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src40.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Source 15 is offset by -2.735914 and -4.390623 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.521660 x 1.521660, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Source 15 is offset by -2.633501 and -4.299000 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.546841 x 1.546841, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.24"
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:33 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.976
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 1, mean size = 13.24"
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0560590201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Warning, spatial fit 35 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Apr 11 06:26:49 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0