[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (256.4, 167.2) = 10 45 35.28 -59 49 10.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.8 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 158.7
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.99'
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.42"
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.895
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 11.42"
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source 91 is offset by -3.143231 and 7.737896 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.312612 x 1.312612, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source is confused with source 90
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.42"
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.895
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 1, mean size = 11.42"
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Warning, spatial fit 80 centroid is now closest to src. 97
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2261.700000, observed total counts = 2224.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 91 = 3.846468 pixels
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 80 to 85
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] 2232.238000 total counts/ 1384.690000 bgd. counts: snr = 22.776554
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 91 = 3.846468 pixels
  Position = (258.6, 164.1) = 10 45 33.96 -59 49 22.1
  Extent = 22.6 (11.4-45.3)" x 22.6 (16.9-45.3)", rotation angle = 192 (216-0) degrees
  Source counts = 847.5 +/- 47.2
  Background counts = 1384.7
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.25
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22454.015400, 14232.370000, 1358.730039, 1358.730039, 192.011000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src.reg
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (181, 86) - (337, 242)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22454.015400, 14232.370000, 2264.550065, 4529.100130, X, Y) && !ellipse(26341.211487, 18143.371780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22787.870000, 12623.314000, 1186.768034, 329.477609, 10.256200, X, Y) && !ellipse(26875.241425, 11342.939041, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29108.086000, 11523.910400, 4000.416115, 1927.048055, 30.671505, X, Y) && !ellipse(21845.686676, 12912.288361, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26695.917400, 19085.381000, 381.456011, 381.456011, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21642.799957, 14724.668442, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23915.844879, 15731.488739, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23075.941920, 15434.189000, 765.827222, 765.827222, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22014.018188, 15521.222366, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22637.365967, 14636.163040, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91.gif