[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (307.4, 219.8) = 10 45 5.86 -59 45 19.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 215.5 +/- 27.1
  Background counts = 229.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.73'
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.30 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.30"
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.899
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 0, mean size = 9.30"
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.30 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.30"
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.899
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 78 for pass 1, mean size = 9.30"
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src78.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src78_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src78 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src78.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src78 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:23 2013] Source 89 is offset by -4.510614 and 0.952308 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.111701 x 1.111701, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3211.810000, observed total counts = 2426.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 89
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2830.480000, observed total counts = 2752.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.087149 pixels
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] 2709.919000 total counts/ 2577.890000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.600382
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.087149 pixels
  Position = (307.4, 219.9) = 10 45 5.85 -59 45 19.6
  Extent = 4.8 (3.5-5.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 132.0 +/- 52.1
  Background counts = 2577.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.002
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26695.917400, 19085.381000, 286.092008, 286.092008, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src.reg
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (291, 203) - (324, 236)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26695.917400, 19085.381000, 476.820014, 953.640027, X, Y) && !ellipse(26341.211487, 18143.371780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25648.416107, 20312.563904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25642.240509, 19874.096436, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26593.579987, 19826.153244, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28244.992279, 19651.789505, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27413.847600, 19187.968800, 351.472010, 351.472010, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.gif