[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.2, 226.4) = 10 44 55.60 -59 44 51.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 139.4 +/- 23.5
  Background counts = 227.9
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun 14 07:09:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.57'
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.21"
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.912
[Fri Jun 14 07:13:31 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 9.21"
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Fri Jun 14 11:07:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2465.470000, observed total counts = 2041.000000
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 86
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.21"
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.912
[Fri Jun 14 15:00:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 1, mean size = 9.21"
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Fri Jun 14 18:20:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source 86 is offset by 7.159888 and 3.381443 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.154671 x 4.660552, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28244.992279, 19651.789505, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86_src.reg
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (288, 189) - (363, 264)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28244.992279, 19651.789505, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27189.631200, 24250.366600, 3390.864098, 2599.032075, 334.450400, X, Y) && !ellipse(26341.211487, 18143.371780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30336.799591, 17167.628601, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25648.416107, 20312.563904, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25642.240509, 19874.096436, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26025.415200, 22200.167800, 906.112026, 365.134411, 81.326679, X, Y) && !ellipse(28668.334400, 21520.021600, 876.048025, 354.960810, 306.103700, X, Y) && !ellipse(27011.255920, 21434.645660, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30945.050873, 21325.975311, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27498.512207, 21087.774048, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30651.808000, 20801.818000, 1239.384036, 412.250412, 96.945470, X, Y) && !ellipse(29483.838400, 20823.291600, 606.463217, 392.295211, 346.476000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26593.579987, 19826.153244, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27413.847600, 19187.968800, 351.472010, 351.472010, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26695.917400, 19085.381000, 381.456011, 381.456011, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 22:17:58 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0560580401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86.gif