[Thu Dec 29 20:22:32 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (193.6, 161.5) = 11 48 21.17 -60 26 17.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 124.4 +/- 22.3 Background counts = 123.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Thu Dec 29 20:22:35 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.50' [Thu Dec 29 20:32:39 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Dec 29 20:32:39 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.68" [Thu Dec 29 20:32:39 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.051 [Thu Dec 29 20:32:39 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.68" [Fri Dec 30 00:15:17 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 00:15:17 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 00:15:17 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 30 00:15:18 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 00:15:18 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 00:15:18 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 11.970098 pixels away [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Dec 30 02:56:19 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Dec 30 02:56:50 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Dec 30 02:56:50 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.68" [Fri Dec 30 02:56:50 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.051 [Fri Dec 30 02:56:50 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 12.68" [Fri Dec 30 06:23:32 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 06:23:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Dec 30 06:23:32 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 06:23:32 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Dec 30 06:23:32 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Dec 30 06:23:33 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 06:23:33 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 30 06:23:33 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0560191401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 30 08:03:11 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 838.335000, observed total counts = 839.000000 [Fri Dec 30 08:03:11 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.715924 pixels [Fri Dec 30 08:03:11 2011] 836.232000 total counts/ 795.480000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.444888 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.715924 pixels Position = (192.9, 161.8) = 11 48 21.57 -60 26 14.5 Extent = 4.9 (3.2-9.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 40.8 +/- 28.9 Background counts = 795.5 Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0007 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability