[Sat Jun 15 20:07:46 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (193.2, 185.5) = 5 37 14.04 -69 24 45.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 84.5 +/- 16.1 Background counts = 80.1 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002 [Sat Jun 15 20:07:46 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.19' [Sat Jun 15 20:08:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 15 20:08:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.02" [Sat Jun 15 20:08:46 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.986 [Sat Jun 15 20:08:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 12.02" [Sat Jun 15 20:08:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:08:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv [Sat Jun 15 20:08:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:08:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv [Sat Jun 15 20:08:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 15 20:08:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:08:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:08:50 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Source 83 is offset by -1.929835 and 3.381185 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.455940 x 1.455940, not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Warning: source 88 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 83 at 12.972258 pixels away [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 15 20:09:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 15 20:10:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 15 20:10:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.02" [Sat Jun 15 20:10:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.986 [Sat Jun 15 20:10:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 1, mean size = 12.02" [Sat Jun 15 20:10:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:10:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.csv [Sat Jun 15 20:10:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:10:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.csv [Sat Jun 15 20:10:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 15 20:10:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:10:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 15 20:10:17 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0556350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src71 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 83 at 10.685779 pixels away [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 862.966000, observed total counts = 846.000000 [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 83 = 0.268463 pixels [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] 870.724400 total counts/ 804.538000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.333434 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 83 = 0.268463 pixels Position = (193.0, 185.3) = 5 37 14.21 -69 24 46.7 Extent = 4.5 (3.1-6.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 66.2 +/- 29.5 Background counts = 804.5 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003 [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 15 20:11:07 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9