[Fri Jul 13 07:25:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (289.1, 243.4) = 16 34 17.29 33 7 23.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 42.3 +/- 8.0
  Background counts = 5.5
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jul 13 07:25:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.04'
[Fri Jul 13 07:54:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 13 07:54:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.45"
[Fri Jul 13 07:54:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.838
[Fri Jul 13 07:54:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.45"
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 08:21:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 82.551800, observed total counts = 70.000000
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 13 08:49:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 13 09:18:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 13 09:18:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.45"
[Fri Jul 13 09:18:33 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.838
[Fri Jul 13 09:18:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.45"
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri Jul 13 09:46:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 113.480000, observed total counts = 70.000000
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 13 10:21:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 13 11:08:04 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25107.082184, 21129.809799, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jul 13 11:08:04 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src.reg
[Fri Jul 13 11:08:04 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (252, 206) - (327, 281)
[Fri Jul 13 11:08:04 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25107.082184, 21129.809799, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jul 13 11:08:04 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.gif
[Fri Jul 13 11:10:23 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6238.14, -1502.58) 
[Fri Jul 13 11:10:25 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Jul 13 11:10:44 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Jul 13 11:10:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jul 13 11:10:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri Jul 13 11:23:27 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 42 counts
[Fri Jul 13 11:23:27 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:06 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:06 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:07 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:07 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00528, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0556210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.arf
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:07 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:07 2012] Updating source flux to 8e-14
[Fri Jul 13 11:43:10 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting