[Sat Jun 16 21:50:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (320.5, 324.8) = 16 31 57.77 -47 51 59.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 39.5 +/- 10.1
  Background counts = 6.0
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun 16 21:50:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.49'
[Sat Jun 16 22:05:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 16 22:05:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67"
[Sat Jun 16 22:05:43 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.975
[Sat Jun 16 22:05:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.67"
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:21:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Source 5 is offset by 7.545957 and 5.865904 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.523586 x 2.523586, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Source 5 is offset by 7.959452 and 0.011720 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.707936 x 3.707936, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Source 5 is offset by 5.322141 and 5.975283 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.666805 x 3.892175, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 16 22:40:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 16 22:43:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 16 22:43:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.67"
[Sat Jun 16 22:43:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.975
[Sat Jun 16 22:43:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.67"
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Jun 16 22:49:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0556140501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Source 5 is offset by 7.545957 and 5.865904 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.203251 x 2.203251, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 16 23:03:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9