[Fri Aug 31 21:23:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (251.3, 293.3) = 16 32 27.66 -47 54 17.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 45.2 +/- 8.9
  Background counts = 8.4
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009

[Fri Aug 31 21:23:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.44'
[Fri Aug 31 22:10:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 31 22:10:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.15"
[Fri Aug 31 22:10:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.110
[Fri Aug 31 22:10:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.15"
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 31 22:56:54 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Source 12 is offset by -7.212812 and 6.837888 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.936547 x 0.936547, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 31 22:57:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 31 23:31:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 31 23:31:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.15"
[Fri Aug 31 23:31:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.110
[Fri Aug 31 23:31:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.15"
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0556140401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 10.880982 pixels away
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep  1 00:21:25 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9