[Fri Jun  1 16:46:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (204.1, 327.8) = 12 56 37.20 -5 43 34.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 84.7 +/- 11.8
  Background counts = 15.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Fri Jun  1 16:46:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.16'
[Fri Jun  1 18:28:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  1 18:28:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.01"
[Fri Jun  1 18:28:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 32, frac = 1.020
[Fri Jun  1 18:28:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 10.01"
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Jun  1 19:14:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Source 11 is offset by -4.055667 and -6.840247 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.146230 x 3.146230, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  1 19:15:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  1 21:24:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  1 21:24:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.01"
[Fri Jun  1 21:24:01 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 32, frac = 1.020
[Fri Jun  1 21:24:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 10.01"
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri Jun  1 21:58:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0556030101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 13.226366 pixels away
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  1 21:59:15 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0