[Mon Dec 26 02:24:23 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (121.5, 353.5) = 14 58 50.31 -11 41 3.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 32.2 +/- 7.6 Background counts = 4.9 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006 [Mon Dec 26 02:24:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.43' [Mon Dec 26 03:39:09 2011] Using EEF radius (= 13.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Dec 26 03:39:09 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.14" [Mon Dec 26 03:39:09 2011] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.988 [Mon Dec 26 03:39:09 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.14" [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 04:15:43 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 12.624777 pixels away [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Dec 26 04:47:41 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Dec 26 05:52:56 2011] Using EEF radius (= 13.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Dec 26 05:52:56 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.14" [Mon Dec 26 05:52:56 2011] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.988 [Mon Dec 26 05:52:56 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.14" [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 06:19:51 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555970301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Dec 26 06:55:07 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 85.793200, observed total counts = 86.000000 [Mon Dec 26 06:55:07 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.207809 pixels [Mon Dec 26 06:55:07 2011] 88.611200 total counts/ 75.580500 bgd. counts: snr = 1.498866 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.207809 pixels Position = (121.6, 353.7) = 14 58 50.31 -11 41 5.0 Extent = 3.4" x 2.7", rotation angle = 198 Source counts = 13.0 +/- 9.4 Background counts = 75.6 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability