[Sun Jun  3 13:06:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (244.5, 166.2) = 10 8 42.43 12 10 29.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 85.2 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 102.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Jun  3 13:06:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.35'
[Sun Jun  3 13:12:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 13:12:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Sun Jun  3 13:12:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.047
[Sun Jun  3 13:12:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 0, mean size = 11.60"
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:52:35 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 43 at 14.028240 pixels away
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 16:43:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 16:44:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 16:44:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.60"
[Sun Jun  3 16:44:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.047
[Sun Jun  3 16:44:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 1, mean size = 11.60"
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:19 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 18:30:20 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555870201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 20:23:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 989.431000, observed total counts = 1002.000000
[Sun Jun  3 20:23:01 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 43 = 0.495626 pixels
[Sun Jun  3 20:23:01 2012] 987.112300 total counts/ 942.095000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.466669
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 43 = 0.495626 pixels
  Position = (244.3, 166.7) = 10 8 42.49 12 10 29.7
  Extent = 7.1" x 2.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 45.0 +/- 31.4
  Background counts = 942.1
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability