[Sun Mar 11 21:03:01 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (286.7, 489.9) = 16 14 6.99 -51 57 14.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 315.0 +/- 28.0 Background counts = 93.2 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0006 [Sun Mar 11 21:03:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.91' [Sun Mar 11 21:11:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Mar 11 21:11:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.38" [Sun Mar 11 21:11:19 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.958 [Sun Mar 11 21:11:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.38" [Mon Mar 12 06:25:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 06:25:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 06:25:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 06:25:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 06:25:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 12 07:01:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 53 [Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 12 07:01:14 2012] Source is confused with source 8 [Mon Mar 12 07:02:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 12 07:02:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.38" [Mon Mar 12 07:02:05 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.958 [Mon Mar 12 07:02:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.38" [Mon Mar 12 18:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 18:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 18:24:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 18:24:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 18:24:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 12 18:24:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 18:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 18:24:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 12 18:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Mon Mar 12 18:24:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 12 19:02:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 50 [Mon Mar 12 19:02:04 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5982.970000, observed total counts = 3320.000000 [Mon Mar 12 19:02:04 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Mar 12 19:02:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Mar 12 19:02:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Mar 12 19:02:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Mar 12 19:02:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Mar 12 19:02:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Mar 12 19:03:12 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24893.394806, 42573.431366, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Mar 12 19:03:12 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg [Mon Mar 12 19:03:12 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (249, 452) - (324, 527) [Mon Mar 12 19:03:12 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24893.394806, 42573.431366, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24698.478485, 43011.880249, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24609.250916, 42054.566956, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24631.433685, 41622.548553, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24635.179932, 40849.183655, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25398.315002, 40402.405945, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27071.495880, 39838.427277, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24691.139984, 43541.744446, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26355.897400, 43778.556000, 2169.152062, 2169.152062, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25516.307159, 43266.919708, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26182.002655, 43022.075562, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26486.027405, 42763.475708, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25370.731903, 42411.721497, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25245.868530, 41707.222748, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25780.684357, 41794.607727, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27235.443939, 41524.623108, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25882.419769, 40407.530151, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25385.963806, 39881.149353, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26719.651600, 39323.768000, 1954.856056, 1954.856056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25455.684875, 43762.032227, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Mar 12 19:03:12 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif [Mon Mar 12 19:11:46 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1421.71, -15219.01) [Mon Mar 12 19:11:51 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Mar 12 19:12:18 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Mar 12 19:12:19 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Mar 12 19:12:19 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Mar 13 01:11:57 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Mar 13 01:11:57 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Mar 13 04:24:17 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Mar 13 04:24:17 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Mar 13 04:24:35 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Mar 13 04:24:35 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00694, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf [Tue Mar 13 04:24:35 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Mar 13 04:24:35 2012] Updating source flux to 5.1e-14 [Tue Mar 13 04:26:15 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting