[Sun Mar 11 21:03:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (390.3, 437.9) = 16 13 18.16 -52 0 58.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 91.9 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 185.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Mar 11 21:03:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.11'
[Sun Mar 11 21:11:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 21:11:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.48"
[Sun Mar 11 21:11:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.903
[Sun Mar 11 21:11:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 12.48"
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 06:25:19 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555660101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 86
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Warning: source 95 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 89 at 10.528964 pixels away
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1519.790000, observed total counts = 1475.000000
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 3.935705 pixels
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 89 to 98
[Mon Mar 12 07:01:13 2012] 1502.682900 total counts/ 1479.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.607167
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 3.935705 pixels
  Position = (387.3, 440.4) = 16 13 19.58 -52 0 49.6
  Extent = 7.6 (5.1-17.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 23.4 +/- 38.8
  Background counts = 1479.3
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability