[Mon Dec 19 23:23:30 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (332.8, 157.1) = 16 15 27.02 -22 54 26.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 123.8 +/- 24.8
  Background counts = 230.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Mon Dec 19 23:23:31 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.55'
[Mon Dec 19 23:34:21 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Dec 19 23:34:21 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.70"
[Mon Dec 19 23:34:21 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.860
[Mon Dec 19 23:34:21 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 11.70"
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:58 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:58 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:58 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54 appears to have run properly
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:59 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:59 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Tue Dec 20 02:39:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 73
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Dec 20 06:26:41 2011] Source is confused with source 62
[Tue Dec 20 06:27:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Dec 20 06:27:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.70"
[Tue Dec 20 06:27:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.860
[Tue Dec 20 06:27:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 1, mean size = 11.70"
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:47 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:47 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:47 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:48 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:48 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:48 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:48 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Tue Dec 20 09:16:48 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:37 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1475.770000, observed total counts = 1693.000000
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:37 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 58
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Source 58 is offset by 7.549769 and -1.650248 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.286432 x 1.286432, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Dec 20 13:16:38 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Dec 20 13:17:34 2011] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28908.685883, 13615.572433, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Dec 20 13:17:34 2011] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58_src.reg
[Tue Dec 20 13:17:34 2011] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (295, 120) - (370, 195)
[Tue Dec 20 13:17:34 2011] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28908.685883, 13615.572433, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29402.322205, 13620.797531, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29231.733917, 15020.668365, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27387.332855, 14578.518372, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Dec 20 13:17:34 2011] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58.gif
[Tue Dec 20 15:39:34 2011] Mean detx,y = (-300.62, 13990.43) 
[Tue Dec 20 15:39:45 2011] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Dec 20 15:40:29 2011] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Dec 20 15:40:30 2011] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Dec 20 15:40:30 2011] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Dec 20 18:21:59 2011] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Dec 20 18:21:59 2011] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:47 2011] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:47 2011] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:51 2011] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:51 2011] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0012, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0555650301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src58.arf
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:51 2011] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Dec 20 23:04:51 2011] Updating source flux to 7.6e-15
[Tue Dec 20 23:15:44 2011] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting