[Mon Jul 22 00:07:12 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (478.2, 286.0) = 15 2 28.57 -42 6 6.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 663.7 +/- 38.7
  Background counts = 211.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jul 22 00:07:27 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.07'
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.96"
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:43 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.970
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 12.96"
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:44 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:44 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:44 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:44 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:09:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:50 2013] Warning, spatial fit 65 centroid is now closest to src. 273
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 22 00:10:51 2013] Source is confused with source 45
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:04 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:04 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.96"
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:04 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.970
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:04 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 12.96"
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.csv
[Mon Jul 22 00:12:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Warning, spatial fit 64 centroid is now closest to src. 277
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Source 46 is offset by -5.401999 and -0.202159 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.495352 x 1.495352, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 22 00:13:11 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 22 00:15:32 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(41558.618103, 24830.459991, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jul 22 00:15:32 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46_src.reg
[Mon Jul 22 00:15:32 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (441, 248) - (516, 323)
[Mon Jul 22 00:15:32 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(41558.618103, 24830.459991, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(41846.262000, 21120.336000, 12284.160353, 12284.160353, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(42160.791200, 22155.612000, 2127.072061, 2127.072061, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40625.542000, 20789.622000, 2047.360059, 2047.360059, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(42149.078033, 22824.779175, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(41092.145386, 24655.453735, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39270.075775, 26566.618164, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38999.899994, 25230.137482, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(42076.839996, 23257.668427, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40078.866730, 22453.746796, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40241.070435, 27247.763275, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39693.773315, 25287.010864, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(42127.192627, 27444.811584, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38947.038361, 25912.971191, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(41743.158569, 27104.004059, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jul 22 00:15:32 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0555631001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46.gif