[Thu Jun 6 19:28:14 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (250.0, 134.1) = 15 2 13.34 -42 2 14.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 443.6 +/- 35.2 Background counts = 203.1 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003 [Thu Jun 6 19:28:14 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.42' [Thu Jun 6 19:30:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 6 19:30:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.64" [Thu Jun 6 19:30:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.733 [Thu Jun 6 19:30:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 0, mean size = 12.64" [Thu Jun 6 19:30:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:30:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:30:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:30:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:30:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 6 19:30:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:30:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:30:48 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:30:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:30:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 81 centroid is now closest to src. 284 [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jun 6 19:32:03 2013] Source is confused with source 294 [Thu Jun 6 19:33:26 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jun 6 19:33:26 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.64" [Thu Jun 6 19:33:26 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.733 [Thu Jun 6 19:33:26 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 1, mean size = 12.64" [Thu Jun 6 19:33:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:33:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:33:28 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:33:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:33:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 6 19:33:31 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:33:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:33:31 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists [Thu Jun 6 19:33:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.csv [Thu Jun 6 19:33:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 31162.000000, observed total counts = 23980.000000 [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 296 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Warning, spatial fit 80 centroid is now closest to src. 291 [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jun 6 19:34:49 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jun 6 19:38:32 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(21705.617950, 11616.738937, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Thu Jun 6 19:38:32 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src296_src.reg [Thu Jun 6 19:38:32 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (213, 97) - (288, 172) [Thu Jun 6 19:38:32 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(21705.617950, 11616.738937, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25822.384000, 11295.720000, 2040.336059, 2040.336059, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28701.188000, 11516.590000, 11426.496329, 11426.496329, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23024.630000, 11828.134800, 1973.184057, 1973.184057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25254.346000, 10916.582000, 2014.528058, 2014.528058, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23872.530731, 11440.417114, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22709.932000, 11302.096800, 2024.488058, 727.584821, 16.565500, X, Y) && !ellipse(24101.996948, 11028.593529, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23382.784027, 11192.753326, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24006.041534, 12828.358902, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22149.813644, 12655.126205, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23564.114563, 12472.774811, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20513.278809, 12124.541168, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20016.585220, 12381.461716, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24015.262451, 11789.512314, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21265.670303, 12200.925034, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Thu Jun 6 19:38:32 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src296.gif