[Mon May 27 08:09:21 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (227.9, 222.7) = 15 4 1.39 -41 46 50.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 691.8 +/- 77.3 Background counts = 298.0 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Mon May 27 08:09:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.50' [Mon May 27 08:12:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 27 08:12:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.18" [Mon May 27 08:12:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.620 [Mon May 27 08:12:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 10.18" [Mon May 27 08:12:45 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:12:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv [Mon May 27 08:12:45 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:12:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv [Mon May 27 08:12:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 08:12:47 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:12:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv [Mon May 27 08:12:47 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:12:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.csv [Mon May 27 08:12:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 08:14:30 2013] Warning: source 52 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 57 at 10.483806 pixels away [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 27 08:14:31 2013] Source is confused with source 8 [Mon May 27 08:15:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 27 08:15:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.18" [Mon May 27 08:15:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.620 [Mon May 27 08:15:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 10.18" [Mon May 27 08:15:59 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:15:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv [Mon May 27 08:15:59 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:15:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv [Mon May 27 08:15:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 08:16:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:16:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv [Mon May 27 08:16:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 08:16:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv [Mon May 27 08:16:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Warning: source 49 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 57 at 10.783333 pixels away [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 27 08:17:56 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 27 21:02:06 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19777.432129, 19326.778076, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon May 27 21:02:06 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57_src.reg [Mon May 27 21:02:06 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (190, 185) - (265, 260) [Mon May 27 21:02:06 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19777.432129, 19326.778076, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25008.150000, 24564.774000, 5096.688147, 5096.688147, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19954.004852, 18210.910416, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23581.374000, 23850.534000, 7525.776217, 7525.776217, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19034.786000, 16648.568000, 1253.096036, 1253.096036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19686.774000, 15875.572000, 1758.032051, 1758.032051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20648.954000, 17932.710000, 1444.568042, 1444.568042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20467.765000, 19588.778000, 1607.456046, 1607.456046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19812.588200, 16817.666000, 10458.096301, 10458.096301, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21090.455627, 18396.206238, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21664.762400, 18918.838000, 2889.136083, 958.064028, 308.622000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18965.134000, 14154.470000, 5916.624170, 5916.624170, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20652.047000, 20401.702000, 2953.728085, 1046.064030, 109.511200, X, Y) && !ellipse(18387.056000, 13205.386000, 5922.048170, 5922.048170, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21882.762000, 19289.836000, 2090.568060, 821.744024, 135.734000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19344.451279, 17003.388489, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22123.402000, 19642.822000, 6700.080193, 6700.080193, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24512.934892, 21400.647845, 8691.936250, 4387.870545, 136.033697, X, Y) && !ellipse(22542.752000, 19843.404000, 4345.968125, 4345.968125, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21776.536600, 20704.068000, 1524.392044, 1524.392044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23423.598000, 20501.022000, 8691.936250, 5599.488161, 135.932300, X, Y) && !ellipse(21588.359600, 22201.206000, 1410.192041, 1410.192041, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23258.528000, 22058.086000, 2109.104061, 2109.104061, 5.829000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21112.810000, 21290.158000, 2051.240059, 2051.240059, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21569.164000, 16467.352000, 1700.944049, 1700.944049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29569.180000, 24900.936000, 9758.736281, 9758.736281, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon May 27 21:02:06 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57.gif [Mon May 27 23:52:58 2013] Mean detx,y = (-6603.38, 2636.95) [Mon May 27 23:53:00 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon May 27 23:53:33 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon May 27 23:53:33 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon May 27 23:53:33 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0555630301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src57_bgd.pi.gz [Tue May 28 16:01:25 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue May 28 16:01:25 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts