[Fri Jun  7 22:47:18 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (434.2, 378.0) = 15 3 16.59 -41 49 17.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 509.2 +/- 47.5
  Background counts = 715.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Jun  7 22:47:34 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.41'
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:05 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:05 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13"
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:05 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.970
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:05 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 12.13"
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:09 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:09 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 104
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Source 102 is offset by -3.100221 and -0.108813 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.356400 x 1.356400, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:03 2013] Source is confused with source 97
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13"
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.970
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 1, mean size = 12.13"
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:39 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:39 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:39 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 15302.000000, observed total counts = 15302.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 102 = 6.163503 pixels
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 89 to 85
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] 12772.936000 total counts/ 12523.200000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.231637
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 102 = 6.163503 pixels
  Position = (428.1, 378.3) = 15 3 18.99 -41 49 15.4
  Extent = 13.5 (8.0-25.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 249.7 +/- 113.0
  Background counts = 12523.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Source 102 is offset by 4.014506 and -3.704621 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.781122 x 3.781122, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Source 102 is offset by -4.597908 and -1.336414 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.333333 x 1.333333, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:29 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9