[Fri Jun  7 22:47:47 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (415.2, 282.9) = 15 3 23.90 -41 56 11.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 482.5 +/- 39.7
  Background counts = 372.1
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Jun  7 22:47:49 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.54'
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.70"
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.027
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:15 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 10.70"
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:50:21 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:25 2013] Source 177 is offset by 3.328987 and 1.338312 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.809361 x 6.882667, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:25 2013] Warning, spatial fit 85 centroid is now closest to src. 67
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Source is confused with source 67
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Source is confused with source 169
[Fri Jun  7 22:51:26 2013] Source is confused with source 175
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.70"
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.027
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 10.70"
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:47 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:47 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  7 22:52:51 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555630201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:51 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 7236.120000, observed total counts = 7292.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:51 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 177 = 2.112585 pixels
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:51 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 81 to 65
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:51 2013] 6948.034000 total counts/ 6783.340000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.999659
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 177 = 2.112585 pixels
  Position = (413.3, 282.1) = 15 3 24.66 -41 56 14.3
  Extent = 9.1 (4.2-13.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 164.7 +/- 83.4
  Background counts = 6783.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  7 22:53:52 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9