[Thu Apr  5 21:43:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (410.9, 317.5) = 16 46 28.64 -45 52 19.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 62.9 +/- 12.4
  Background counts = 33.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Thu Apr  5 21:43:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.27'
[Thu Apr  5 22:31:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Apr  5 22:31:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Thu Apr  5 22:31:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.875
[Thu Apr  5 22:31:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 10.56"
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 10.508449 pixels away
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Apr  5 23:14:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 00:00:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Apr  6 00:00:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.56"
[Fri Apr  6 00:00:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.875
[Fri Apr  6 00:00:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 10.56"
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0555350101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 371.585000, observed total counts = 316.000000
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Apr  6 00:24:29 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9