[Fri Dec 23 19:33:31 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (255.8, 230.4) = 1 57 7.51 -17 6 7.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.3 +/- 13.1
  Background counts = 36.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Fri Dec 23 19:33:31 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.82'
[Fri Dec 23 22:44:22 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Dec 23 22:44:22 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34"
[Fri Dec 23 22:44:22 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.892
[Fri Dec 23 22:44:22 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 9.34"
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 00:24:33 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 31 at 10.384808 pixels away
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 24 02:15:24 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 24 06:40:57 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 24 06:40:57 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.34"
[Sat Dec 24 06:40:57 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.892
[Sat Dec 24 06:40:57 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 9.34"
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:56 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:56 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:56 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:57 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 24 08:06:57 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0555220201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Sat Dec 24 09:50:12 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 432.473000, observed total counts = 431.000000
[Sat Dec 24 09:50:12 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 31 = 0.207565 pixels
[Sat Dec 24 09:50:12 2011] 438.790700 total counts/ 415.127000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.161428
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 31 = 0.207565 pixels
  Position = (255.7, 230.6) = 1 57 7.54 -17 6 7.3
  Extent = 2.3" x 2.3", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 23.7 +/- 20.9
  Background counts = 415.1
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability