[Sun Jun  3 11:13:41 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (292.0, 447.3) = 11 27 36.87 25 1 57.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.4 +/- 19.9
  Background counts = 110.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Sun Jun  3 11:13:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.80'
[Sun Jun  3 11:16:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 11:16:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.83"
[Sun Jun  3 11:16:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.868
[Sun Jun  3 11:16:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.83"
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 14:08:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -504.863000, observed total counts = 183.000000
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:47 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.83"
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.868
[Sun Jun  3 14:11:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.83"
[Sun Jun  3 16:25:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 16:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 16:25:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 16:25:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 16:25:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 16:26:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 16:26:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 16:26:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 16:26:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun  3 16:26:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554933401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 16:28:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sun Jun  3 16:28:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 307.182000, observed total counts = 307.000000
[Sun Jun  3 16:28:12 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 4.431938 pixels
[Sun Jun  3 16:28:12 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 11
[Sun Jun  3 16:28:12 2012] 306.198967 total counts/ 306.196000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000170
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 4.431938 pixels
  Position = (291.4, 451.6) = 11 27 37.08 25 2 14.8
  Extent = 23.2 (2.9-43.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 306.2
  Rate = 1e-06 +/- 0.009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability