[Thu Aug 23 10:24:51 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (323.5, 318.1) = 4 53 23.70 -55 51 32.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 140.7 +/- 31.2 Background counts = 95.2 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002 [Thu Aug 23 10:24:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.31' [Thu Aug 23 11:19:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Aug 23 11:19:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.58" [Thu Aug 23 11:19:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.994 [Thu Aug 23 11:19:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.58" [Thu Aug 23 11:34:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 11:34:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 11:34:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 11:34:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 11:34:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 23 11:34:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 11:34:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 11:34:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 11:34:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 11:34:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 6 [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Aug 23 11:34:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Aug 23 12:00:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Aug 23 12:00:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.58" [Thu Aug 23 12:00:54 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.994 [Thu Aug 23 12:00:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.58" [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv [Thu Aug 23 12:13:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0554930501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Source 2 is offset by -5.991673 and -0.492186 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.871844 x 0.871844, not incorporating fit results [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Aug 23 12:13:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9