[Tue May  8 10:28:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (357.6, 318.9) = 18 8 25.00 -20 24 32.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.7 +/- 11.1
  Background counts = 21.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  8 10:28:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.54'
[Tue May  8 14:18:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 14:18:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.70"
[Tue May  8 14:18:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.000
[Tue May  8 14:18:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.70"
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 15:49:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Source 9 is offset by 6.383924 and 7.084316 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.847236 x 2.847236, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  8 15:49:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  8 18:29:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  8 18:29:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.70"
[Tue May  8 18:29:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.000
[Tue May  8 18:29:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 8.70"
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  8 19:33:41 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0554600301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue May  8 19:34:09 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 303.234000, observed total counts = 303.000000
[Tue May  8 19:34:09 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.259762 pixels
[Tue May  8 19:34:09 2012] 298.859400 total counts/ 271.833000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.639219
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.259762 pixels
  Position = (357.6, 319.2) = 18 8 25.01 -20 24 31.7
  Extent = 3.0 (2.2-4.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 27.0 +/- 17.3
  Background counts = 271.8
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability