[Fri Dec 16 22:38:31 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (291.3, 309.4) = 13 41 16.40 30 21 52.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 86.0 +/- 17.3 Background counts = 102.0 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008 [Fri Dec 16 22:38:31 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.95' [Fri Dec 16 22:40:39 2011] Using EEF radius (= 6.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Dec 16 22:40:39 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.90" [Fri Dec 16 22:40:39 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.919 [Fri Dec 16 22:40:39 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 6.90" [Fri Dec 16 22:58:04 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 22:58:04 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 22:58:04 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 22:58:05 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 22:58:05 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 22:58:05 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Source 14 is offset by -6.015488 and -6.965195 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.346299 x 6.346299, not incorporating fit results [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Dec 16 23:12:26 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Dec 16 23:12:34 2011] Using EEF radius (= 6.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Dec 16 23:12:34 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.90" [Fri Dec 16 23:12:34 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.919 [Fri Dec 16 23:12:34 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 6.90" [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 16 23:31:20 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554501101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly [Fri Dec 16 23:44:13 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 328.999000, observed total counts = 329.000000 [Fri Dec 16 23:44:13 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.097340 pixels [Fri Dec 16 23:44:13 2011] 344.165000 total counts/ 316.747000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.540563 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.097340 pixels Position = (291.3, 309.5) = 13 41 16.40 30 21 52.0 Extent = 2.9 (1.7-4.5)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 27.4 +/- 18.6 Background counts = 316.7 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability