[Fri Nov 25 07:28:04 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (278.4, 267.5) = 1 0 33.88 -47 49 55.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.1 +/- 14.1
  Background counts = 48.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Nov 25 07:28:05 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.67'
[Fri Nov 25 07:31:25 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Nov 25 07:31:25 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.77"
[Fri Nov 25 07:31:25 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.197
[Fri Nov 25 07:31:25 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 7.77"
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:35 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:35 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:35 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24 appears to have run properly
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:36 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:36 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 08:50:36 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Warning, spatial fit 24 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:03 2011] Source is confused with source 27
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:27 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:27 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.77"
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:27 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.197
[Fri Nov 25 09:48:27 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 7.77"
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:23 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:23 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri Nov 25 11:29:24 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0554500201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Fri Nov 25 12:40:47 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 712.000000, observed total counts = 712.000000
[Fri Nov 25 12:40:47 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.441119 pixels
[Fri Nov 25 12:40:47 2011] 715.804300 total counts/ 679.213000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.404025
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.441119 pixels
  Position = (278.8, 267.7) = 1 0 33.73 -47 49 54.0
  Extent = 6.3 (1.9-15.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 36.6 +/- 26.8
  Background counts = 679.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability