[Sat Jun 15 03:53:52 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (352.1, 411.9) = 16 14 53.80 -28 27 44.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 98.1 +/- 14.2
  Background counts = 33.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Jun 15 03:53:52 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.10'
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.98"
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:19 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.984
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 10.98"
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 14.228773 pixels away
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:35 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.98"
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.984
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 10.98"
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 03:54:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0553720101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Source 18 is offset by 8.474534 and -1.556853 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.264873 x 1.264873, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 03:55:06 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0