[Tue Aug 7 20:34:20 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (397.0, 316.9) = 13 18 33.91 31 11 56.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 150.0 +/- 17.1 Background counts = 35.2 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Tue Aug 7 20:34:20 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.27' [Tue Aug 7 20:37:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Aug 7 20:37:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06" [Tue Aug 7 20:37:17 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.137 [Tue Aug 7 20:37:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 10.06" [Tue Aug 7 20:58:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 20:58:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 20:58:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 20:58:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 20:58:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 7 20:58:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 20:58:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 20:58:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 20:58:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 20:58:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 202.022000, observed total counts = 183.000000 [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Aug 7 21:22:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Aug 7 21:22:39 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Aug 7 21:22:39 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Tue Aug 7 21:22:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06" [Tue Aug 7 21:22:39 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.137 [Tue Aug 7 21:22:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.06" [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Tue Aug 7 21:38:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 205.682000, observed total counts = 183.000000 [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Aug 7 21:57:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Aug 7 21:57:59 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34491.676178, 27521.332184, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Aug 7 21:57:59 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src.reg [Tue Aug 7 21:57:59 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (360, 279) - (435, 354) [Tue Aug 7 21:57:59 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34491.676178, 27521.332184, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Tue Aug 7 21:57:59 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.gif [Tue Aug 7 22:02:36 2012] Mean detx,y = (-8487.72, -3096.89) [Tue Aug 7 22:02:38 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Aug 7 22:03:04 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Aug 7 22:03:05 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Aug 7 22:03:05 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Aug 7 22:53:22 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Aug 7 22:53:22 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Aug 7 23:15:40 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Aug 7 23:15:41 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Aug 7 23:15:41 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Aug 7 23:15:41 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.011, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0553561001_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.arf [Tue Aug 7 23:15:41 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Aug 7 23:15:41 2012] Updating source flux to 4.9e-14 [Tue Aug 7 23:16:02 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting