[Mon Jul 16 04:30:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (274.5, 292.0) = 5 1 9.65 45 17 18.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 105.7 +/- 16.9
  Background counts = 19.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Jul 16 04:30:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.80'
[Mon Jul 16 05:26:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 16 05:26:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.33"
[Mon Jul 16 05:26:12 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.576
[Mon Jul 16 05:26:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.33"
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Source 5 is offset by -6.281529 and 5.765934 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.616635 x 2.616635, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 16 05:46:46 2012] Source is confused with source 7
[Mon Jul 16 05:59:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 16 05:59:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.33"
[Mon Jul 16 05:59:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.576
[Mon Jul 16 05:59:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.33"
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0552971401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Source 5 is offset by -6.281529 and 5.765934 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.948901 x 2.011007, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 16 06:13:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9