[Mon Jul 23 11:30:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (206.6, 174.3) = 4 8 53.07 -21 13 12.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 106.1 +/- 21.5
  Background counts = 173.1
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Mon Jul 23 11:30:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.20'
[Mon Jul 23 11:40:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 23 11:40:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.03"
[Mon Jul 23 11:40:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.938
[Mon Jul 23 11:40:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 0, mean size = 12.03"
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:34 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Mon Jul 23 14:17:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Warning: source 80 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 85 at 11.283508 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:14 2012] Source is confused with source 84
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.03"
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 40, frac = 0.938
[Mon Jul 23 16:28:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 1, mean size = 12.03"
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.csv
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.csv
[Mon Jul 23 19:02:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1707.330000, observed total counts = 1130.000000
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 85
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Warning: source 79 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 85 at 17.657106 pixels away
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul 23 21:11:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul 23 21:12:21 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(17925.992584, 15113.806793, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jul 23 21:12:21 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src.reg
[Mon Jul 23 21:12:21 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (169, 137) - (244, 212)
[Mon Jul 23 21:12:21 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(17925.992584, 15113.806793, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19228.656710, 17358.816914, 433.623138, 401.275519, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19417.870804, 15618.981873, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17476.940842, 15189.122009, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jul 23 21:12:21 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85.gif
[Mon Jul 23 23:05:15 2012] Mean detx,y = (-5481.14, 14036.24) 
[Mon Jul 23 23:05:20 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Mon Jul 23 23:05:41 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Mon Jul 23 23:05:41 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jul 23 23:05:41 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jul 24 01:13:02 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Jul 24 01:13:02 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:55 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:55 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:58 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:58 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.000921, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0552510101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src85.arf
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:58 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jul 24 03:16:58 2012] Updating source flux to 7e-15
[Tue Jul 24 03:20:59 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting