[Mon Mar 12 17:39:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (140.6, 229.0) = 17 20 20.65 -29 7 18.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 246.2 +/- 25.5
  Background counts = 137.2
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Mar 12 17:39:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.50'
[Mon Mar 12 17:45:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 17:45:38 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Mar 12 17:45:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.68"
[Mon Mar 12 17:45:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.900
[Mon Mar 12 17:45:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.68"
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 18:27:44 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 472.999000, observed total counts = 473.000000
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 2.529925 pixels
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] 471.492200 total counts/ 412.775000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.890072
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 2.529925 pixels
  Position = (142.8, 227.9) = 17 20 19.91 -29 7 25.3
  Extent = 9.5 (6.0-17.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 58.7 +/- 21.7
  Background counts = 412.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 19:07:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 19:08:02 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 12 19:08:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.48"
[Mon Mar 12 19:08:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.255
[Mon Mar 12 19:08:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 9.48"
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 12 19:51:24 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0552002601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 391.999000, observed total counts = 392.000000
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.353439 pixels
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] 393.764200 total counts/ 345.758000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.581732
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.353439 pixels
  Position = (142.5, 228.0) = 17 20 20.02 -29 7 24.9
  Extent = 8.7 (5.6-13.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 48.0 +/- 19.8
  Background counts = 345.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0009
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 12 20:44:42 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9