[Mon Mar 19 23:20:10 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (99.0, 293.6) = 12 30 28.11 12 23 59.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 130.6 +/- 28.0 Background counts = 224.5 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002 [Mon Mar 19 23:20:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.46' [Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.66" [Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.057 [Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 13.66" [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source 9 is offset by 0.764303 and -4.613531 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.629724 x 1.629724, not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source 9 is offset by -4.238042 and -0.362933 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.563683 x 1.563683, not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source 9 is offset by -0.973697 and 9.643688 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.624216 x 1.624216, not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 2 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 4 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 10 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.66" [Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.057 [Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 13.66" [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 21.111094 pixels away [Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3111.890000, observed total counts = 3110.000000 [Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.231172 pixels [Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] 3081.283000 total counts/ 3046.030000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.638747 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.231172 pixels Position = (99.2, 293.5) = 12 30 28.06 12 23 59.4 Extent = 4.7 (3.4-8.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 35.3 +/- 55.5 Background counts = 3046.0 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.005 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability