[Mon Mar 19 23:20:10 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (79.9, 305.1) = 12 30 33.80 12 24 48.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 200.3 +/- 27.6
  Background counts = 198.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon Mar 19 23:20:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.85'
[Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.36"
[Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.831
[Mon Mar 19 23:23:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 14.36"
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 00:47:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3215.750000, observed total counts = 1999.000000
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 3
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 4
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:23 2012] Source is confused with source 10
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.36"
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.831
[Tue Mar 20 01:19:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 14.36"
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Tue Mar 20 04:53:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6033.940000, observed total counts = 5905.000000
[Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.792221 pixels
[Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 4 to 1
[Tue Mar 20 06:48:21 2012] 5930.032100 total counts/ 5878.350000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.674082
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.792221 pixels
  Position = (80.6, 305.4) = 12 30 33.59 12 24 51.3
  Extent = 5.5 (3.5-9.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 51.7 +/- 77.0
  Background counts = 5878.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability