[Sat Dec 31 21:50:42 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (235.6, 486.2) = 12 30 16.90 12 19 6.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 94.0 +/- 18.3 Background counts = 88.2 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001 [Sat Dec 31 21:50:43 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.35' [Sat Dec 31 21:57:02 2011] Using EEF radius (= 13.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Dec 31 21:57:02 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.61" [Sat Dec 31 21:57:02 2011] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.817 [Sat Dec 31 21:57:02 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.61" [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 00:25:57 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 16 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:07 2012] Source is confused with source 5 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jan 1 02:10:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.61" [Sun Jan 1 02:10:21 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.817 [Sun Jan 1 02:10:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.61" [Sun Jan 1 07:53:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 07:53:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Sun Jan 1 07:53:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 07:53:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Sun Jan 1 07:53:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jan 1 07:53:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 07:53:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Sun Jan 1 07:53:40 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0551870401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Sun Jan 1 11:57:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1435.610000, observed total counts = 1440.000000 [Sun Jan 1 11:57:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 6.706971 pixels [Sun Jan 1 11:57:26 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 6 [Sun Jan 1 11:57:26 2012] 1261.460059 total counts/ 1261.460000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000002 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 6.706971 pixels Position = (232.8, 480.0) = 12 30 17.71 12 18 36.9 Extent = 27.4 (3.4-51.4)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 0.0 +/- 35.5 Background counts = 1261.5 Rate = 6e-09 +/- 0.004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability