[Wed May 30 01:31:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (293.6, 379.3) = 8 6 21.37 15 35 1.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 136.6 +/- 14.0
  Background counts = 14.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Wed May 30 01:31:49 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.87'
[Wed May 30 01:33:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 01:33:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.36"
[Wed May 30 01:33:08 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.640
[Wed May 30 01:33:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 9.36"
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Wed May 30 02:05:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 276.168000, observed total counts = 228.000000
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 30 02:35:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 30 02:35:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 02:35:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.36"
[Wed May 30 02:35:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.640
[Wed May 30 02:35:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 9.36"
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Wed May 30 03:07:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 269.001000, observed total counts = 226.000000
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 30 03:32:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 30 03:33:04 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25494.246521, 32947.298737, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed May 30 03:33:04 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11_src.reg
[Wed May 30 03:33:04 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (256, 342) - (331, 417)
[Wed May 30 03:33:04 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25494.246521, 32947.298737, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Wed May 30 03:33:04 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11.gif
[Wed May 30 03:36:58 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1880.58, 8460.83) 
[Wed May 30 03:37:00 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Wed May 30 03:37:17 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Wed May 30 03:37:17 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May 30 03:37:17 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed May 30 03:47:53 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Wed May 30 03:47:53 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed May 30 04:05:34 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed May 30 04:05:34 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May 30 04:05:35 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed May 30 04:05:35 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0136, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0551860101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src11.arf
[Wed May 30 04:05:35 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed May 30 04:05:35 2012] Updating source flux to 5.8e-14
[Wed May 30 04:05:48 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting