[Sat Dec 17 23:18:21 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (282.6, 215.6) = 2 57 10.10 -23 32 18.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 125.9 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 176.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Dec 17 23:18:21 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.11'
[Sun Dec 18 01:31:28 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Dec 18 01:31:28 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.48"
[Sun Dec 18 01:31:28 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.870
[Sun Dec 18 01:31:28 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 9.48"
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:33 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:33 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:33 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 03:26:34 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 39 at 13.589893 pixels away
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Dec 18 03:27:07 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Dec 18 07:34:23 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Dec 18 07:34:23 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.48"
[Sun Dec 18 07:34:23 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.870
[Sun Dec 18 07:34:23 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 9.48"
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Dec 18 09:32:34 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551850201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sun Dec 18 09:33:06 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 919.901000, observed total counts = 919.000000
[Sun Dec 18 09:33:06 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 39 = 0.573438 pixels
[Sun Dec 18 09:33:06 2011] 932.992300 total counts/ 893.296000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.328166
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 39 = 0.573438 pixels
  Position = (282.3, 216.1) = 2 57 10.19 -23 32 18.2
  Extent = 2.7 (2.4-4.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 39.7 +/- 30.5
  Background counts = 893.3
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability