[Tue May 15 15:09:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.3, 225.2) = 7 44 46.93 39 22 24.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 203.6 +/- 19.9
  Background counts = 46.1
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0004

[Tue May 15 15:10:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.31'
[Tue May 15 16:32:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 16:32:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.09"
[Tue May 15 16:32:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.933
[Tue May 15 16:32:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.09"
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 17:41:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 21 at 12.204607 pixels away
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 15 19:03:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 20:15:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 15 20:15:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.09"
[Tue May 15 20:15:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.933
[Tue May 15 20:15:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 9.09"
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 15 21:13:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 21 at 12.204607 pixels away
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 15 22:28:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 15 23:35:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26164.657349, 19542.623993, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May 15 23:35:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21_src.reg
[Tue May 15 23:35:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (264, 188) - (339, 263)
[Tue May 15 23:35:39 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26164.657349, 19542.623993, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28069.709900, 17592.766495, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23680.942000, 21277.942400, 413.642412, 413.642412, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May 15 23:35:39 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21.gif
[Tue May 15 23:40:42 2012] Mean detx,y = (4933.45, -573.30) 
[Tue May 15 23:40:44 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue May 15 23:41:00 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue May 15 23:41:00 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 15 23:41:00 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed May 16 00:12:05 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Wed May 16 00:12:05 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed May 16 01:17:08 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed May 16 01:17:08 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed May 16 01:17:09 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed May 16 01:17:09 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00439, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0551850101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src21.arf
[Wed May 16 01:17:09 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed May 16 01:17:09 2012] Updating source flux to 4.9e-14
[Wed May 16 01:17:14 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting