[Tue May 1 11:39:43 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (369.3, 270.6) = 14 0 43.30 2 49 4.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 167.1 +/- 22.0 Background counts = 150.1 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Tue May 1 11:39:44 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.52' [Wed May 2 00:56:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 2 00:56:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.19" [Wed May 2 00:56:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.916 [Wed May 2 00:56:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 9.19" [Wed May 2 03:25:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists [Wed May 2 03:25:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv [Wed May 2 03:25:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 03:25:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv [Wed May 2 03:25:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 2 03:25:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists [Wed May 2 03:25:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv [Wed May 2 03:25:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists [Wed May 2 03:25:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv [Wed May 2 03:25:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1093.240000, observed total counts = 979.000000 [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 46 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 2 03:26:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 3 05:34:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 3 05:34:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.19" [Thu May 3 05:34:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.916 [Thu May 3 05:34:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 9.19" [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu May 3 08:03:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1092.760000, observed total counts = 979.000000 [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 46 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 3 08:04:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat May 5 17:25:37 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32084.817780, 23493.591675, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 5 17:25:37 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46_src.reg [Sat May 5 17:25:37 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (332, 233) - (407, 308) [Sat May 5 17:25:37 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32084.817780, 23493.591675, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Sat May 5 17:25:37 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46.gif [Sat May 5 18:09:45 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3645.58, -6069.54) [Sat May 5 18:09:49 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat May 5 18:10:31 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat May 5 18:10:32 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 5 18:10:32 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46_bgd.pi.gz [Sat May 5 20:18:08 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat May 5 20:18:08 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat May 5 21:04:31 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat May 5 21:04:31 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat May 5 21:04:33 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat May 5 21:04:33 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00191, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src46.arf [Sat May 5 21:04:33 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat May 5 21:04:33 2012] Updating source flux to 2.5e-14 [Sat May 5 21:08:53 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting