[Tue May  1 11:39:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (414.9, 283.8) = 14 0 30.08 2 50 4.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.3 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 128.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 11:39:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.51'
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.858
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 10.68"
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source 34 is offset by -6.907398 and 5.227587 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.469435 x 2.469435, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.858
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 10.68"
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 34 at 11.104603 pixels away
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9