[Tue May  1 11:39:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (311.2, 347.3) = 14 1 0.19 2 54 35.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 391.6 +/- 32.4
  Background counts = 205.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0003

[Tue May  1 11:39:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.66'
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.956
[Tue May  1 20:18:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.26"
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Wed May  2 00:56:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 00:56:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source 16 is offset by -3.699781 and 6.940513 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.900740 x 2.900740, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source 16 is offset by -1.812103 and -1.035510 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.983885 x 0.983885, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2650.130000, observed total counts = 2651.000000
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 1.788717 pixels
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 10 to 43
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] 2523.563000 total counts/ 2302.620000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.604358
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 1.788717 pixels
  Position = (309.6, 348.1) = 14 1 0.65 2 54 42.9
  Extent = 13.5 (8.6-17.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 220.9 +/- 50.2
  Background counts = 2302.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May  2 03:25:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.46"
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.910
[Thu May  3 03:10:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.46"
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 05:33:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0551830101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 19
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2610.500000, observed total counts = 2589.000000
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 2.303224 pixels
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 29
[Thu May  3 08:04:38 2012] 2518.429200 total counts/ 2465.170000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.072683
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 2.303224 pixels
  Position = (308.0, 349.8) = 14 1 1.11 2 54 50.2
  Extent = 6.1 (2.1-17.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 53.3 +/- 50.2
  Background counts = 2465.2
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability