[Wed Mar 14 22:08:38 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (383.2, 439.2) = 15 10 35.21 5 54 11.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 110.9 +/- 15.2
  Background counts = 27.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Wed Mar 14 22:08:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.91'
[Thu Mar 15 03:46:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 03:46:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.38"
[Thu Mar 15 03:46:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.937
[Thu Mar 15 03:46:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 0, mean size = 12.38"
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Thu Mar 15 16:49:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 11.384033 pixels away
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 15 16:50:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 15 23:55:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 23:55:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.38"
[Thu Mar 15 23:55:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.937
[Thu Mar 15 23:55:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 1, mean size = 12.38"
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Fri Mar 16 10:53:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551780301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Warning: source 29 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 16.392935 pixels away
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 16 10:54:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9