[Thu Mar 29 13:06:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (370.2, 272.0) = 0 42 25.23 41 13 42.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 595.2 +/- 31.5
  Background counts = 107.7
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.002

[Thu Mar 29 13:06:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.54'
[Thu Mar 29 13:11:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 13:11:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Thu Mar 29 13:11:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.987
[Thu Mar 29 13:11:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 0, mean size = 9.20"
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.csv
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.csv
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.csv
[Thu Mar 29 20:42:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:57 2012] Source 86 is offset by 3.747279 and -0.448247 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.067816 x 1.067816, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1291.420000, observed total counts = 1488.000000
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 86
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 30 03:53:58 2012] Source is confused with source 89
[Fri Mar 30 03:55:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar 30 03:55:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Fri Mar 30 03:55:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.987
[Fri Mar 30 03:55:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 1, mean size = 9.20"
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Fri Mar 30 09:10:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1936.120000, observed total counts = 1435.000000
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 86
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2309.780000, observed total counts = 1390.000000
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 86
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Warning: source 71 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 86 at 10.863042 pixels away
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 30 16:39:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 30 16:40:42 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32159.315247, 23616.304474, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Mar 30 16:40:42 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86_src.reg
[Fri Mar 30 16:40:42 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (333, 235) - (408, 310)
[Fri Mar 30 16:40:42 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32159.315247, 23616.304474, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29142.652374, 26350.963409, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27406.796800, 26910.718800, 5992.824172, 4659.840134, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32643.948400, 25931.282200, 400.011212, 400.011212, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34402.459229, 22123.089447, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33711.578125, 22170.895905, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32989.529633, 26462.981750, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31237.778473, 25394.794434, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32602.561768, 24352.071503, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29414.152000, 24441.924000, 1244.672036, 1244.672036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33625.898880, 24069.372265, 463.306073, 443.252836, 28.086830, X, Y) && !ellipse(32779.986755, 23476.161407, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30575.977905, 23103.825409, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31445.776123, 22077.168060, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Mar 30 16:40:42 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86.gif
[Fri Mar 30 19:01:14 2012] Mean detx,y = (5449.68, -588.54) 
[Fri Mar 30 19:01:19 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Mar 30 19:02:02 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Mar 30 19:02:03 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Mar 30 19:02:03 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 04:01:33 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Mar 31 04:01:33 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:09 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:09 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:14 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:14 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0389, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0551690601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src86.arf
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:14 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Mar 31 09:26:14 2012] Updating source flux to 1.3e-13
[Sat Mar 31 09:35:31 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting