[Thu Aug  9 11:05:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (204.2, 319.0) = 6 37 10.10 35 35 44.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 53.6 +/- 12.4
  Background counts = 40.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008

[Thu Aug  9 11:05:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.99'
[Thu Aug  9 11:40:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 11:40:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.92"
[Thu Aug  9 11:40:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.163
[Thu Aug  9 11:40:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 9.92"
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 11.216149 pixels away
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 12:17:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 12:44:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 12:44:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.92"
[Thu Aug  9 12:44:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.163
[Thu Aug  9 12:44:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 9.92"
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 279.150000, observed total counts = 278.000000
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.406272 pixels
[Thu Aug  9 13:22:38 2012] 277.408200 total counts/ 260.222000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.065388
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.406272 pixels
  Position = (204.2, 319.4) = 6 37 10.09 35 35 44.0
  Extent = 2.5" x 2.5", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 17.2 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 260.2
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability