[Tue Jul 3 08:11:28 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (275.5, 278.9) = 15 9 34.64 -66 49 16.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 79.1 +/- 16.3 Background counts = 21.2 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006 [Tue Jul 3 08:11:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.18' [Tue Jul 3 09:35:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 3 09:35:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.52" [Tue Jul 3 09:35:03 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.007 [Tue Jul 3 09:35:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.52" [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 10:22:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 24 [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 3 10:23:00 2012] Source is confused with source 22 [Tue Jul 3 11:58:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 3 11:58:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.52" [Tue Jul 3 11:58:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.007 [Tue Jul 3 11:58:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.52" [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Tue Jul 3 12:44:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 22 [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Source 23 is offset by -7.272136 and -0.301747 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 4.956506 x 4.956506, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 3 12:44:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23919.206146, 24218.866028, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg [Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (238, 241) - (313, 316) [Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23919.206146, 24218.866028, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24929.799120, 24114.046600, 1313.584838, 1313.584838, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24026.607391, 24743.606018, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23971.143829, 23359.167542, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23957.274000, 25375.896000, 1189.120034, 1189.120034, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif [Tue Jul 3 14:31:35 2012] Mean detx,y = (-739.35, -115.97) [Tue Jul 3 14:31:36 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Jul 3 14:31:44 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Jul 3 14:31:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jul 3 14:31:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Jul 3 14:37:18 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 79 counts [Tue Jul 3 14:37:18 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00269, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0551430301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.arf [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Jul 3 14:42:34 2012] Updating source flux to 2.7e-14 [Tue Jul 3 14:42:58 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting