[Thu Jun  6 12:09:13 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (291.7, 272.5) = 14 29 44.78 -62 40 40.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.9 +/- 11.0
  Background counts = 17.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Thu Jun  6 12:09:13 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.94'
[Thu Jun  6 13:02:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 13:02:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Thu Jun  6 13:02:58 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.826
[Thu Jun  6 13:02:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.40"
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  6 13:17:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  6 13:57:10 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 13:57:10 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Thu Jun  6 13:57:10 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.826
[Thu Jun  6 13:57:10 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.40"
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551120201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 836.038000, observed total counts = 743.000000
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  6 14:12:28 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9